Executive Leadership and Corporate Communication,
Leading to Diploma - Postgraduate - in Executive
Leadership and Corporate Communication,
Triple-Credit, 90 Credit-Hours,
accumulating to a Postgraduate Certificate, with
90
additional Credit-Hours, and a Postgraduate Diploma,
with
270 additional Credit-Hours.
Business Development Experts;
Business Partners;
Chief Executive Officers (CEO);
Chief Executives;
Chief Secretaries;
Co-Directors;
Corporate Directors;
Deputy Vice-Chancellors;
Divisional Managers;
Enhanced Supervisors;
Entrepreneurs;
Human Resource Development Managers;
Human Resource Management Managers;
Line Managers;
Management Consultants;
Management Development Directors;
Managing Directors;
Managing Partners;
Organisational Leaders;
Performance Consultants;
Personal Assistants;
Project Managers;
Project Team Leaders;
Senior Administrators;
Senior Business Associates;
Senior Business Executives;
Senior Civil Servants;
Senior Consultants;
Senior Executives and Managers;
Senior Leaders who oversee the activities of teams;
Senior Managers;
Senior Secretaries;
Special Assistants;
Specialist Team Leaders;
Talent Managers;
Team Development Personnel;
Team Leaders;
Team members themselves;
Team Supervisors;
Training and Development Managers;
Training Directors;
Transaction Analysts;
Vice-Chancellors;
Vice-Presidents;
Those Managers and Corporate Executives seeking an enhanced
understanding and heightened competence in the most salient
issues that are associated with Executive Leadership and
Corporate Communication;
All others who are desirous in enhancing their expertise in
team formation, team development, team behaviour, resonation
control, transactional analysis and other salient aspects of
team dynamics.
Doctor of Philosophy {(PhD) {University College London
(UCL) - University of London)};
MEd Management (University of Bath);
Postgraduate (Advanced) Diploma Science Teacher Ed.
(University of Bristol);
Postgraduate Certificate in Information Systems
(University of West London, formerly Thames Valley
University);
Diploma in Doctoral Research Supervision, (University of
Wolverhampton);
Teaching Certificate;
Fellow of the Institute of Management Specialists;
Human Resources Specialist, of the Institute of
Management Specialists;
Member of the Asian Academy of Management (MAAM);
Member of the International Society of Gesture Studies
(MISGS);
Member of the Standing Council for Organisational
Symbolism (MSCOS);
Member of ResearchGate;
Executive Member of Academy of Management (AOM). There,
his contribution incorporates the judging of
competitions, review of journal articles, and guiding
the development of conference papers. He also
contributes to the Disciplines of:
Human Resources;
Organization and Management Theory;
Organization Development and Change;
Research Methods;
Conflict Management;
Organizational Behavior;
Management Consulting;
Gender & Diversity in Organizations; and
Critical Management Studies.
Professor Dr. Crawford has been an Academic in the
following UK Universities:
University of London (Royal Holloway), as Research
Tutor;
University of Greenwich (Business School), as Senior
Lecturer (Associate Professor), in Organisational
Behaviour and Human Resource Management;
University of Wolverhampton, (Wolverhampton Business
School), as Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor), in
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resource Management.
London Southbank University (Business School), as
Lecturer and Unit Leader.
His responsibilities in these roles included:
Doctoral Research Supervisor;
Admissions Tutor;
Postgraduate and Undergraduate Dissertation Supervisor;
Programme Leader;
Personal Tutor.
He was formerly an Expatriate at:
Ministry of
Education, Sokoto, Nigeria;
Ministry of
Science and Technical Education, Sokoto, Nigeria;
University of
Sokoto, Nigeria;
College of
Education, Sokoto, Nigeria; and
Former
Editor-In-Chief of ‘Sokoto Journal of Education’.
Snacks on Event Days;
Lunch on Event Days;
City Tour;
Stationery;
On-site Internet Access;
Postgraduate Diploma; Postgraduate
Certificate; Diploma – Postgraduate; or
Certificate of Attendance and Participation –
if unsuccessful on resit
Leather Conference Folder;
Leather Conference Ring Binder/ Writing Pad;
Key Ring/ Chain;
Leather Conference (Computer – Phone) Bag
– Black or Brown;
8-16 GB USB Flash Memory Drive,
with Course Material;
Branded Metal Pen;
Branded Polo
Shirt.; &
Branded Carrier Bag.
Team development is an important issue in organisational
development, not least because of the need to keep work
teams constantly motivated and their mental capacity
challenged and maintained. Team commitment is desirable and
team morale paramount, in the organisation’s strive for
effectiveness. This commitment is based on several factors,
stemming from a combination of moral commitment; calculative
commitment; and remunerative commitment. The associated
development activities are designed to ensure that work
teams progress and function effectively. The leader’s
responsibility incorporates the following activities:
Ensuring that the team is kept highly motivated, through the
use of both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation;
Maintaining the team’s level of effectiveness to its
maximum, by averting dysfunctional behaviour, preventing
over-cohesiveness and ‘resonation’;
Guaranteeing that, through effective gatekeeping, the
skills, knowledge and expertise of the team, incorporating
marketing intelligence, are effectively utilised in task
planning, organising and performance;
Managing conflict, to encourage ‘teamthink’, while averting
‘groupthink’ and its adverse effect.
Many organisations are now moving towards the creation of
teams, with a view to improving workers' esteem and
commitment. However, if the process is ineffectively
managed, their development can be impaired, creating even
greater problems for the organisation than persists prior to
their creation. Without a clear understanding of team
dynamics, the entity might generate a situation wherein a
team might be ineffective because of it is deficient in
relation to the factors that are associated with its growth
and development, relevant to its current stage of operation.
An organisation, therefore, needs to recognise the stages of
development of a team and the factors relevant to its launch
into the 'performing stage', taking cognisance of the
psychological factors related to the ‘disbandment phase’ and
the efforts that can be made to address them in such a way
that members' future contribution to the organisation’s
effectiveness is not impaired.
This course addresses all the above crucial issues,
equipping participants with the needed expertise to
effectively manage teams, making intervention into their
operation, where appropriate, to enhance and maintain their
performance, towards objective accomplishment.
Specifically, by the conclusion of the specified learning
and development activities, delegates will be able to:
Address the salient issues associated with Dysfunctional
Behaviours;
Analyse the concept of leasing in relation to delegating;
Analyse the perception in each role;
Apply appropriate rewards and, or, punishment that are
applied to a given team situation – thereby promoting team
‘functionality’;
Apply group dynamics to organisational settings;
Ascertain the relationship between an incumbent’s experience
and role enactment;
Ascertain the relationship between an incumbent’s role
perception and his or her role performance;
Clarify roles in team settings;
Define objectives, generally;
Define role set;
Define role;
Define, describe and analyse the nature of an organisation;
Demonstrate a heightened understanding of role
relationships;
Demonstrate a heightened understanding of the type and
permanence of the leadership of a team;
Demonstrate a high level of understanding of a team attempts
to replace a situational leader, to enhance stability,
acceptability or renewed or clarified mission or objectives;
Demonstrate an awareness of their ‘Team Building and
Maintenance Roles’ that will improve team effectiveness;
Demonstrate an effective ‘leader behaviour’ when dealing
with dysfunctional behaviours;
Demonstrate an understanding of the concept of power and how
it might be applied for the benefit of the organisation;
Demonstrate an understanding of the issue of
‘responsibility’ and how it translates in
superior-subordinate relationships in organizations
Demonstrate an understanding of the notion that societal
socio-economic hierarchy might be informally represented in
teams;
Demonstrate the effectiveness of the strategy that they have
devised for dealing with intra-team competition;
Demonstrate their ability to deal with the psychological
effect of disbandment;
Demonstrate their ability to employ transactional analysis
in a team context;
Demonstrate their ability to manage conflict effectively,
incorporating the occasions when it should be encouraged;
Demonstrate their appreciation of the fact that workers
belong to different classes, in society;
Demonstrate their awareness of the value of team
cohesiveness and team solidarity, and the dangers of
over-cohesiveness;
Demonstrate their grasp of the fundamentals of performance
management;
Demonstrate their understanding of the ‘risky shift
syndrome’, outlining the steps that they will take to avert
them;
Demonstrate their understanding of the importance of
Gatekeeping in team formal settings;
Demonstrate their understanding of the theoretical and
practice bases of Team Dynamics;
Demonstrate their understanding of the social and
psychological relevance of the stages of formation of a
group;
Describe role as the behavioural expectations of a role set;
Describe self-ideal as a behavioural construct;
Describe the democratic incumbent, autocratic incumbent, the
generous incumbent, the dedicated incumbent, the social self
and the role of each;
Describe the effort that they will make to enhance the
‘critical faculty’ of their team;
Detect Dysfunctional Behaviours;
Determine some exemplifying roles;
Determine the boundary relationship of a role set;
Determine the optimum team size for effective functioning;
Determine the place of an incumbent’s perceived role
expectations on his or her role enactment;
Determine why a temporary team is likely to be more
problematic to lead than a permanent team;
Develop effective communication strategies that might be
applied to team settings, minimising technical language;
Differentiate social objectives from business objectives;
Distinguish between command teams, boards, committees and
task forces;
Distinguish between formal and informal organisations;
Distinguish between groups and mere aggregations;
Distinguish between informal management and formal
management succession charts;
Distinguish between task forces, committees, command groups
and boards
;
Distinguish between Temporary Committees and Standing
Committees;
Enumerate examples of business and non-business
organisations;
Establish a basis for standard setting in their teams;
Establish the link between role and the external
environment;
Establish the link between role and the internal
environment;
Establish the relationship between self-ideal and a
performance enhancer;
Evaluate the effectiveness of their strategy for addressing
situations where team members seek sympathy;
Exhibit a knowledge of the intimidating effect that class
might have on team members, and, hence, the leader’s
responsibility to ensure that this informal hierarchy is
dispensed with in the promotion of a ‘classless team’;
Exhibit tact in discouraging team member distracting
behaviours;
Explain facets #1 and 2 of authority;
Explain how social objectives lead to profitability gain;
Explain the bases for the feeling of
‘Togetherness’ or ‘Awareness’ IN An Aggregation;
Explain the concept of segmental expectations;
Explain the occasions in which a situational leader is
likely to emerge;
Explain the Team Typological Bases;
Explain why a team’s disbandment might have a negative
psychological effect on members and the team leader
;
Explore the bases for ‘division of labour/work’ in
organisations and their relation to organisational
effectiveness;
Expound the facet of authority, providing practical examples
Identify role segments;
Identify some organisational tasks and determine how tasks
are grouped;
Identify the role expectations of social support;
Identify the set of complimentary relationship in every
role;
Illustrate how they might resolve interpersonal problems
among team members;
Illustrate how they will determine the contribution of each
team member to team goal accomplishment;
Illustrate how they will enhance the issue of ‘gatekeeping’
to ensure that team members, in general, participate in team
meetings, extending support to the weak, ensuring that
introverted team members are not intimidated or ‘crushed’ by
the extroverted;
Indicate how they will establishing key competencies in
teams;
Indicate how they will help team members to channel their
energies into task performance, establishing realistic
goals;
Indicate how they will recognise resonation
in their teams, outline the steps that they will take to
avert or reduce its occurrence, outlining how they will
‘cautioning’ resonators;
Indicate how they will reward exceptional performance in
their teams;
Indicate how they would handle blocking, effectively;
Indicate the range of tangible rewards that might be
utilised in a team;
Indicate the steps that they will take to harmonising their
teams;
Information, who might, nevertheless, be able to perform
evaluative role;
Internalise the dysfunctional effect of ‘resonation’ in a
team context;
Know the importance of delegation in increasing productivity
and workflow;
Order the team formation stages, explaining the
psychological issues that beset them and relate them to
organisational functioning;
Outline the steps that they will take to avert groupthink
and promote teamthink;
Peruse business objectives through business objectives;
Propose an effective remedy to ‘member withdrawal’;
Propose an effective way of dealing with interfering
behaviour;
Propose standards of measuring competence in teams;
Propose suitable intangible rewards that might be applied to
a team situation;
Provide a basis for team standard setting - establishing
standards and evaluating progress;
Provide an indication of their awareness of the fact that
team members’ class consciousness might relate to the
positions that they occupy in the organisation or society;
Provide an individually synthesized proposal for dealing
with aggressiveness;
Provide examples of command teams, highlighting the
situations in which a leader might belong to two Command
Teams;
Provide examples of how a leader should encourage desirable
behaviours in a team;
Put forward a satisfactory way of addressing ‘special
pleading’;
Recognise and acknowledge performance improvement in teams;
Recognise the ineloquent team members;
Resonation as an issue in team effectiveness;
Suggest how they might employ an effective diversity
management that discourages resonation;
Suggest how to determine which individual members of a team
can improve their performance – and subsequently, their
contribution to the team as a way of harnessing team
synergy;
Suggest how to establish acceptable performance levels in
teams, noting performance indicators;
Suggest the difference in interpretation of groups and
teams;
Suggest ways of improving group morale, while enhancing
their effectiveness
;
Suggest ways to counteract the effect of the informal
hierarchy - in teams other than command teams;
Advise others of the situations in which participant
observation, conversation analysis, documentary analysis,
focus groups, interviews & questionnaires, respectively, are
appropriate;
Assess the value of secondary sources of information as a
prelude to the presentation of primary information;
Choose the most appropriate data elicitation techniques, in
relation to the sampling frame, sampling unit, sample size &
time span, among other factors;
Decide on the amount of notice that is required for
particular meetings;
Demonstrate their ability to ‘gate-keep’ at meetings;
Demonstrate their ability to analyse data;
Demonstrate their ability to convene meetings;
Demonstrate their ability to work collaboratively in
Designing an investigation;
Demonstrate their competence in conducting meetings within
time limits;
Demonstrate their understanding of at least 2 approaches to
leadership;
Demonstrate their understanding of the High and Low LPC
Leaders’ degree of behavioural control over their
subordinates, respectively;
Design interview & questionnaire schedules that will elicit
information appropriate to the objectives of the report;
Design questionnaires & interview schedules, with a mixture
of open-ended & closed-ended items, avoiding forced-choice
in the latter;
Design structured & unstructured questions, determining the
conditions under which they should be used;
Distinguish between data and information;
Distinguish between groups and mere aggregations;
Distinguish between summary and conclusions;
Distinguish between task forces, committees, command groups
and boards;
Distinguish between the concepts of ‘leader’ and ‘managerial
leader’;
Distinguish between the importance and urgency of meetings;
Employ the most appropriate data analysis techniques, based
on the type & volume of data available;
Exhibit their competence in promoting ‘harmony’ at meetings;
Exhibit their competence to seek consensus at meetings;
Explain ‘Person’ or ‘Consideration Oriented’ leaders and
their relationship with employee satisfaction and subsequent
staff turnover level;
Explain the relationship between the ‘goal-path model’ of
leadership & the expectancy theory of motivation;
Identifying ‘trends’ & ‘patterns’ in information, in an
effort to arrive at the appropriate conclusions;
Illustrate their newly acquired skill in Data
Interpretation;
Manage an investigation, from inception and design to
reporting;
Plot the relationship between managers with high & low least
preferred co-worker (LPC), characteristics, respectively;
Point to specific empirical research supporting the
relationship between participative leadership;
Present Information in an interesting and accurate manner;
Produce effective reports, adhering to conventional styles,
presenting evidence from the data, & exploiting visual
representations;
Schedule meetings, taking pertinent factors into account;
Suggest how informal groups might be empowered to enhance
organisational effectiveness;
Suggest problems with equalities or traits approaches;
Suggest the difference in interpretation of groups and
teams;
Use Microsoft Excel to make necessary calculations.
Demonstrate their understanding of the social and
psychological relevance of the stages of formation of a
group;
Design an investigation, taking pertinent factors into
account;
Design Instruments for Data Elicitation;
Part 1. Organisational Analysis In
Context.
Part 2. Role in an Organisational
Context.
Part 3. Role and Role Conflict in
Organisations.
Part 4. Salient Team Dynamic Issues.
Part 5. Team Typologies and Their
Bases.
Part 6. Team Formation, Stage
Significance, and Task Implications.
Part 7. Effective Team Leadership.
Part 8. Intra-Team Relationship:
Analysis and Intervention.
Part 9. Enhancing Team Performance.
Part 10. Team Performance
Enhancement Effort.
Part 11. Executive High-Performance
Leadership.
Part 12. Information Gathering,
Processing and Presentation.
Part 13. Information Gathering,
Processing and Presentation.
Part 14: Meetings: Scheduling and
Conduct.
Part 15. Addressing Resonation and
Issues Associated With Transactional Analysis..
Executive Leadership and Corporate Communication,
Leading to Diploma - Postgraduate - in Executive
Leadership and Corporate Communication,
Triple-Credit, 90 Credit-Hours,
accumulating to a Postgraduate Certificate, with
90
additional Credit-Hours, and a Postgraduate Diploma,
with
270 additional Credit-Hours.
|